Capitalism in America … D.O.A.

Rasmussen has a new poll out indicating a paltry 53% of Americans believe that capitalism is a better “system.” I believe that if the actual definition of capitalism were explained to the poll’s respondents this percentage would be, sadly, far lower.

Capitalism is a social system, not merely a system of competition (variations of competition exist in many social systems, it is not unique to capitalism). It is principally concerned with fundamental premises, not consequences or, especially, particular outcomes. Moreover, it is premised upon the recognition of individual rights , particularly private property rights, in which all property is privately owned. The only legitimate purpose of government in true capitalism is to protect life, liberty and property from violence. This implies the rule of law, just courts, non-interventionism, and a reliable-sound-medium of economic exchange. The key to capitalism is the autonomy of the traders – two or more parties free to engage in mutually beneficial exchange without coercion or compulsion and free to keep the fruits of their labor.

If the above conceptualization of what capitalism really is had been explained to the respondents, I dare say less than 30% would prefer it over the interventionist, fiat currency funded, economies typical of most Western nations including the United States. Why I suggest this is that there is another aspect to this Rasmussen poll that is worth contemplating. The fact that 53% percent prefer what I believe the respondents understand as a managed economic system, yet refer to it as capitalism, is disheartening when one realizes that here in America we more than likely are approaching roughly 50% (perhaps more) of the populace whose livelihoods are based upon the redistribution of other peoples wealth…

From teachers to snow plow drivers, soldiers to scientists, Americans do not know what capitalism really is, have never lived under it in its full bloom, and frankly have no concept of what things could be like if that were the case. Of course, when you add to this mix businessmen who practice their trade at the trough of government largess the matrix gets even more revealing. The bottom line is that there are just too many of us who have home mortgages, college tuition, car payments, and retirement funding tied directly to redistributionism – capitalism would be a nightmare to these legions of blood suckers.

The flipside of the survey implies 47% of the population either believes socialism is better, or are not sure what is a preferable system. As mind numbing as it appears your average American’s grasp of capitalism, so too is thier conceptualization of socialism. This is the troubling component of the survey because that percentage, coupled with 1/2 of the 53% who likely misconstrue capitalism, means that true capitalism is not understood nor desired; indoctrination into statism and redistributionism has clearly taken its toll at the expense of free minds and its corrolary, free markets .

Folks, capitalism is the only moral social system ever conceived; the only social system consonant with and adequate to supporting free men and free minds. Sadly, Americans do not fully (or at all) understand this and as a result do not perceive the danger and consequences of the path upon which we are clearly now embarked and, truth be told, have been embarked for the last 100 years.

Capitalism is not alive and well here in America, it is dead on arrival.

Posted in Capitalism Advocacy, Liberty, Property Rights. Comments Off

Where Is The Outrage!

This is INCREDIBLE stuff on its face, even more incredible is the fact that there is no national outrage over this! Where are the people’s representatives?

All you pin heads who were screaming about AIG executives getting bonus money after bailout funds were distributed need to wake up! That meaningless menagerie was just that – smoke and mirrors.

You want a real reason to be outraged – this is it!

Napolitano:
I was at a dinner last night (3/31/09) in Washington, D.C.. sitting next to me was a banker who was the Chair and CEO of one of the ten largest banking holding companies in the United States. They have $250 billion in assets, no bad debt of which they are aware, did not engage in credit default swaps, they have no sub-prime mortgages, and they don’t need any government assistance.

He informed me that the FDIC and The Treasury came to him and said ‘if you don’t issue a special class of stock just for us, which we can borrow, we will audit you publicly – it will cost you millions in employee time and bad publicity and in lost business. That’s your choice.’

Isn’t that extortion?

This successful banker begged the federal government to let him run his bank. Begged his board of directors to let him tell the FDIC to ‘go take a hike.’

The board caved, they issued a special class of stock, Hank Paulson bought the special class of stock (2% of the company’s stock). That was September…

Come March (knock, knock) Sheila Bair comes knocking: ‘we own 2% of your stock, and here’s how you are going to structure your corporation’

So, A, if this story is true, and I have no reason to believe it is not true, this is extortion. Which is, B, a crime, and C, we have a 2% share owner of non-voting stock now trying to control management.

Stossel: Is this the banker that gives out copies of Atlas Shrugged ? The charity that does that?

Napolitano: Yes.

Napolitano: John, you would have been very comfortable at this dinner party…

Stossel: Yes, I would have.

FF to 9:20 of the first video segment to see a replay of this incredible discussion..

Posted in Outrage and Rant. Comments Off

Read My Lips …

h/t to Brietbart

picture-archive-527

“I can make a firm pledge,” Obama said in Dover, N.H., on Sept. 12, 2008. “Under my plan, no family making less than $250,000 a year will see any form of tax increase. Not your income tax, not your payroll tax, not your capital gains taxes, not any of your taxes.”

He repeatedly vowed “you will not see any of your taxes increase one single dime.”

Now in office, Obama, who stopped smoking but has admitted he slips now and then, signed a law raising the tobacco tax nearly 62 cents on a pack of cigarettes, to $1.01. Other tobacco products saw similarly steep increases.

Apparently, what constitutes a tax increase is merely in the eye of the recipient…

Posted in Taxes. Comments Off